Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 24, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cijeiam.

This is an appeal in a'workmen’s compensation case. On certiorari the Supreme Court found facts from which it determined that “the workman suffered an injury by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.” There was evidence to support such findings of fact. It is the settled procedural rule in this court that findings of fact on conflicting evidence, or on uncontroverted evidence reasonably susceptible of divergent inferences, are conclusive on appeal. Alexander v. Cunningham Roofing Co., Inc., 125 N. J. L. 277.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

For…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ptak v. General Electric Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Augustin v. Bank Building and Equipment Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Gagliano v. Botany Worsted MillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. Augustin v. Bank Bldg. and Equipment Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Jensen v. Wilhelms Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API