Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ortiz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Trial was scheduled for July 12, 1994. In the course of several court appearances prior to the trial date, the parties advised the court of their inability to locate the alleged victim. At a July 7,1994, hearing on the defendant’s motion *1012to suppress the alleged victim’s photographic identification of the defendant, defense counsel informed the motion judge that the presiding judge at an earlier conference had continued the case to that date for the purpose of determining whether the alleged victim could be located. Defense counsel recalled that the judge had instructed the parties that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. CronkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. PeritoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. ConnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. CleggMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. JenkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. BandeiraMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API