Honey v. Guillaume
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Blackford Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Application by Arthur Guillaume for license to retail intoxicating liquors, against which William H. Honey and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for the applicant, Honey appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
Appellee was, by the Board of Commissioners
of the County of Blackford, on November 5, 1908, granted a license to sell intoxicating liquors at retail in the fourth ward of Hartford City. On appeal, by remonstrators, to the circuit court, the license was confirmed, from which latter judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
On May 1, and on July 31, 1908, prior to appellee’s application for license, remonstrances by the voters of said fourth ward had been filed with the auditor of the county against the granting of a license to any person or persons to sell intoxicating liquors at retail within the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Whitesell v. StricklerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Bessler v. LaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. EllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Bonsell v. BonsellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Workman v. WorkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Brier v. MankeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Harting v. Vandalia Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hessong v. WolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926