Legal Opinion

Krapp v. Eldridge

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Wabaunsee District Court. ACTION by Eldridge against Krapp, to recover an attorney’s fee. Trial at the October Term, 1883, when the plaintiff recovered a judgment for $100, and his costs taxed at $23.70. New trial denied. Krapp brings the judgment to this court for review.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The facts in this case are as follows: On September 5, 1882, Edward Krapp filed his bill of particulars before a justice of the peace of Wabaunsee county, against E. W. Eldridge, to recover $67.50. To this bill of particulars, E. W. Eldridge filed an answer, setting forth an alleged set-off, consisting, among other things, of $100, for attorney-fees in the case of the The State v. Wilfelt, alleged to have been rendered by James Carroll at the instance of Krapp, which Carroll transferred to Eldridge, in writing, on July 10, 1882. Upon the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Alldritt v. Kansas Centennial Global Exposition, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  3. First National Bank of Topeka v. United Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Stewart v. PriceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Ryan & Walsh v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API