Legal Opinion
Warner v. Delbridge & Cameron Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Willard E. Warner, ancillary receiver in Michigan of the Minneapolis Mutual Eire Insurance-Company, against the Delbridge & Cameron Company, upon a premium note. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 3d of April, 1890, defendant applied for and received a policy of insurance in the Minneapolis Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and executed and delivered the following agreement: •
“Minneapolis, Minn., April 3, 1890.
“For value received, in policy No. 01,037, dated the 3d day of April, 1890, we promise to pay the Minneapolis Mutual Fire Insurance Company the sum of three hundred and seventy-five dollars, by installments, at such times as the directors of said company may order and assess, for the losses and expenses of said company, pursuant to its charter and by-laws. It is hereby…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Glenn v. LiggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mutual Fire Insurance v. Phoenix Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Ely v. Oakland Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Collins v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re Wisconsin Mut. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Cheese Makers Mutual Casualty Co. v. DuelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.