Legal Opinion
Smith v. Hartrampf
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 6, 1962No. 39599PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
The original summons of garnishment in this case was directed to Smith Hardware Company and the return showed service on “Smith Hardware Co. by serving the same on Mr. Smith its agent.” After a recovery by plaintiff Hartrampf, claimant Frank Smith was granted a new trial in this court because the plaintiff had failed to carry the burden of showing that the property levied on was owned by the defendant garnishee Smith Hardware Co. Smith v. Hartrampf, 105 Ga. App. 40 (123 SE2d 417). Subsequently, the return of the original summons of garnishment was amended to show service on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Southern Express Co. v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- McGhee v. Mayor of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Dillard v. Jacksons Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Clements v. Sims T v. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parker v. KilgoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc. v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SampleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963