Palmer v. Friedman

The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover $28,787.22 claimed to be the amount of the *263deficiency after a sale had under a deed of trust. Judgment ivent in favor of the plaintiffs and against all of the defendants. Aaron Friedman, one of the defendants, appealed. It was the contention of the plaintiffs, as shown in their complaint and the evidence offered in support thereof, that on the 26th day of March, 1930, the plaintiffs agreed to lend and the defendants agreed to borrow $65,000 to be evidenced by a promissory note to be executed by Joseph Friedman and Ernestine Friedman payable to…