Legal Opinion

Rothkopf v. Rothkopf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for payment of several loans, in which a judgment by confession was entered by the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated November 16, 1990, which denied their motion to vacate an order of the same court, which granted, upon their default in answering, a motion by the intervener to vacate the judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs contend that the intervenor’s service of the order to show cause seeking to vacate the confessed judgment was ineffective and thus did not confer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County National Bank v. VogtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. County National Bank v. VogtNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Rohdie v. Michael Guidice, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Weill v. EricksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corpuel v. GalassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Yihye v. BlumenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Pemberton v. FuchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API