Legal Opinion

Gill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1919No. 5114PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft. The pleader, in writing the complaint, in undertaking to write the word "corporeal” wrote it "carporeal.” This misspelling did not render the indictment invalid. Branch’s Ann. P. C., sec. 490, and cases listed.

There was an application for continuance on account of absence of two witnesses who were not summoned, and the motion for new trial does not complain of any injury or error in respect to them. They are alleged residents of the county and no affidavits from them are attached to the motion for new trial, or accounted for.

A second, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bronson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Bacon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Suggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Nikoleropoulos v. RamseyUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. West and Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API