SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. Dean
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, Judge.
Solomon Motor Company (“the employer”) appeals from a judgment of the Houston Circuit Court in favor of Earnest Dean (“the employee”) on his claim against the employer under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. (“the Act”). In its judgment, the trial court determined, in pertinent part, that the employee was permanently and totally disabled as a result of a work-related injury to his right knee and awarded benefits under the Act commensurate with a permanent and total disability. Because the facts of this case would support only an award of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Stone & Webster Constr., Inc. v. LanierCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Werner Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. GrabenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008