Legal Opinion

SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. Dean

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2008No. 2060957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

Solomon Motor Company (“the employer”) appeals from a judgment of the Houston Circuit Court in favor of Earnest Dean (“the employee”) on his claim against the employer under the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. (“the Act”). In its judgment, the trial court determined, in pertinent part, that the employee was permanently and totally disabled as a result of a work-related injury to his right knee and awarded benefits under the Act commensurate with a permanent and total disability. Because the facts of this case would support only an award of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Stone & Webster Constr., Inc. v. LanierCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Werner Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. GrabenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API