Legal Opinion
Rachlin v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2001No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint but erred in sua sponte directing defendants to pay plaintiffs damages in the amount of $1,900 for “the difference between the 1994 damage estimate and 1996 damage estimate or excessive wear & tear.” Because plaintiffs never requested that relief, we modify the order by vacating the last ordering paragraph.
Plaintiffs entered into a two-year lease agreement with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Brown v. BorrusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Fili v. Matson Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schlanger v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Preston v. Peter Luger Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- McArdle v. Navistar International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Raux v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Tedone v. H.J. Heinz Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.