Mallett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
*62 OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
KELLER, P.J., and WOMACK, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, J.J.
Finding counsel to be ineffective, the Thirteenth Court of Appeals reversed Fidel Mallett’s conviction despite there being nothing in the record to reveal counsel’s motivation for his decisions. Since the record is silent, we presume that counsel’s decisions were based on reasonable professional judgment, and we reverse the appellate court’s judgment.
Facts and Procedural History
Corpus Christi Freightliner hired Mal-lett to paint a truck for $800. After examining the finished product, the company’s general manager decided that…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1,178 opinions
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Rylander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Salinas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
1,173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.