Legal Opinion

Roemer v. Board of City Canvassers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to meet and correctly canvass certain votes cast for aider-man. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Eelator was a candidate at the November election for alderman of the Fifth ward of the city of Detroit. At the close of the polls the inspectors of election for the third district of the said ward made a canvass of the votes,' publicly announced the result, and prepared and signed a return, which was at once filed with the city clerk. This return shows that the relator received 350 votes in such district, and that Alois A. Deimel received 171 votes. The board of canvassers convened on the 7th of November, for the purpose of canvassing the returns. Canvasser Erhard, who was also one of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Keeler v. RobertsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Coll v. City Board of Canvassers of ElectionMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sherburne v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Stearns v. State Ex Rel. BiggersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Belknap v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Johnson v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Robbins v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API