Legal Opinion

Austin v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1965No. Civ. 27646PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

John Austin, a policeman of the City of Santa Monica, sues in his own right and on behalf of all policemen and firemen of the city for a declaration of their rights to sick leave benefits as members of their respective departments. The case was tried upon stipulated facts, judgment was in favor of the city and plaintiff appeals.

As a member of the police department plaintiff was entitled to sick leave benefits at full pay measured in weeks and proportioned to his years of service. He was also entitled to workmen’s compensation while disabled in performance of his services. 1

Plaintiff’s rights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawthorn v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Park County v. CooneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Eason v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marsille v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers' Ass'n v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Campbell v. City of MonroviaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Johnson v. Contra Costa County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Mannetter v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API