People v. Membrino
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph E. Gubbay, J.
The defendant is charged with violations of section 1192 (1) and (3) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
The defendant has moved to suppress his statement as the fruit of the poisonous tree insofar as defendant’s arrest was unlawful and because it was taken in the absence of Miranda warnings.
Defendant also moves to suppress his refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test as a product of the illegal arrest and because he was not properly warned of the consequences of such refusal.
The court makes the following findings based upon the credible evidence obtained…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. AlamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. HasenflueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Prudhomme v. HultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- People v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. Cross (Kanzada)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016