Legal Opinion

Pit River Tribe v. United States Forest Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2006No. 04-15746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

The Pit River Tribe, the Native Coalition for Medicine Lake Highlands Defense, and the Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center (collectively Pit River) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment on their claims against the Bureau of Land Management, the United States Forest Service, and the Department of the Interi- or (collectively agencies). Pit River alleges that the procedures followed by the agencies in extending certain leases in the Medicine Lake Highlands, and the subsequent approval of a geothermal plant to be built there, violated the National…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stacy Ernst v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Pit River Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API