Art Neon Co. v. City and County of Denver
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WINNER, District Judge.
Following submission of comprehensive pretrial briefs, this case was tried to the Court. Thereafter, long post trial briefs were filed, and the case is ready for determination by this opinion which contains the findings and conclusions required by Rule 52.
Plaintiffs’ complaint makes a hydra-headed attack on the validity and constitutionality of the sign code of the City and County of Denver. [Revised Municipal Code, Sec. 613, and, more particularly, Sec. 613.5 of the Code.] Some of plaintiffs’ claims raise questions we deem to arise only under the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Art Neon Co. v. The City and County of Denver, a Municipal Corporation, and Anthony H. Jansen, Gump Glass Co., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974