Sykes v. Carmack

This is a suit in replevin to Tecover possession of an automobile, and the controlling question in the case is the one of fact, whether the title to the car had been reserved when it was sold.

This issue of fact was submitted to a jury under instructions of which no complaint is made. There was a verdict and judgment against plaintiff, from which is this appeal, and for the reversal of that judgment it is insisted that the juiy’s verdict was contrary to the undisputed evidence.

The testimony in plaintiff’s behalf was to the following effect. He was a licensed automobile dealer, and operated a…