State v. Crider
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentSweeney, J.
(dissenting) — The current right of allocu*862tion is spelled out in the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981: "Before imposing a sentence upon a defendant, the court shall conduct a sentencing hearing. . . . The court shall . . . allow arguments from the . . . offender . . . .” RCW 9.94A.110. Whether Michael Crider was denied that right to allocution is questionable. But even if he was, any error was harmless. I therefore respectfully dissent.
Before he sentenced Mr. Crider, the judge read a lengthy letter from him, addressed specifically to the judge, outlining his troubled childhood, problems in his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AumickWashington Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.