Legal Opinion

People v. Randall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s claim that his guilty plea was coerced by his attorney is belied by the minutes of the. plea proceeding and plea withdrawal hearing, which show that the plea represented a voluntary and intelligent choice among alternative courses of action, including exposure to a harsher sentence after trial or even after further plea negotiations (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 19-20). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FredericksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. ArroyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997