Legal Opinion

Studley v. Empire State Building Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered July 29, 1997, to the extent that it granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of standing, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from so much of said order as denied plaintiffs ex parte application to disqualify defendant partnership’s attorneys, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The portion of the order that denied plaintiffs application is not appealable (Parkchester S. Condominium v Pickett, 209 AD2d 291). Were we to address the matter, we would nonetheless deny the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Levine v. Murray Hill Manor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Parkchester South Condominium, Inc. ex rel. Unit Owners of Parkchester South Condominium v. PickettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haskin v. DenoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Studley v. MalkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API