Legal Opinion

Parkison v. Burley

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1983No. 82CA1494PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Willis E. Parkison and Charles F. Stewart, who were record owners of a mineral interest in real property, appeal a judgment of the trial court determining that their interests had been acquired by defendant, Carl F. Burley, by virtue of a treasurer’s deed. See § 39-11-120(1), C.R.S.1973 (1982 Repl.Yol. 16B). Plaintiffs contend that the treasurer’s deed is invalid, because contrary to the requirements of § 39-ll-128(l)(a), C.R.S.1973 (1982 Repl.Vol. 16B) the treasurer failed to conduct a “diligent inquiry” to determine their addresses and provide them notice of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Bald Eagle Mining and Refining Company v. BruntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Swofford v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Siddoway v. AingeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Harrod v. HarrodColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. LangelColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Klingsheim v. CordellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Klingsheim v. CordellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  5. Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API