Parkison v. Burley
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Willis E. Parkison and Charles F. Stewart, who were record owners of a mineral interest in real property, appeal a judgment of the trial court determining that their interests had been acquired by defendant, Carl F. Burley, by virtue of a treasurer’s deed. See § 39-11-120(1), C.R.S.1973 (1982 Repl.Yol. 16B). Plaintiffs contend that the treasurer’s deed is invalid, because contrary to the requirements of § 39-ll-128(l)(a), C.R.S.1973 (1982 Repl.Vol. 16B) the treasurer failed to conduct a “diligent inquiry” to determine their addresses and provide them notice of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Bald Eagle Mining and Refining Company v. BruntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Swofford v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Siddoway v. AingeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Harrod v. HarrodColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schmidt v. LangelColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Klingsheim v. CordellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Klingsheim v. CordellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Sandstrom v. SolenColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.