Royster v. Mageveney

This Jwas a suit by plaintiffs to recover commissions for the sale of the defendant’s property in Mem*149phis. Tbe verdict and judgment were for defendant, and plaintiffs bave appealed.

Tbe plaintiffs allege, that as real estate brokers, they were employed by defendant in 1877, to sell a certain store-house in Memphis, and that they procured a purchaser therefor, etc. There is also a count in the declaration for money paid, and work and labor done by plaintiffs. Without reviewing the facts, it is sufficient to say, that there is evidence sufficient to sustain a verdict either way. Plaintiffs…