Legal Opinion
United States v. William Prentis Tucker, No. 74-2225 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Parti
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1974No. 944Published
1Opinion of the Court
502 F.2d 944
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Prentis TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 74-2225 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, PartI.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 14, 1974.
Floyd M. Buford, Macon, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
William J. Schloth, U.S. Atty., Ronald T. Knight, O. Hale Almand, Asst. U.S. Attys., Macon, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit judges.
2Per curiam
1
Appellant's assertion that 18 U.S.C.…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Ollie Herman Lincoln, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974