In Re Apostolopoulos' Estate
Utah Supreme Court
1Dissent
I am unable to agree with the conclusions reached by Mr. Justice FRICK in the court's opinion in this matter, and shall state, as briefly as I can, my reasons for not agreeing.
We are not here dealing with an estate in which there are no heirs, such as the court was considering in Re Melrose Avenue, reported in 234 N.Y. 48, 136 N.E. 235, 23 A.L.R. 1233. The court there held in the absence of heirs that the title vested in the state immediately upon the death of the intestate. It is stipulated in this case that the deceased left heirs. By the provisions of Comp Laws Utah 1917, § 6405, upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of People (Melrose Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- State v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Connell v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. Atkinson v. World Real Estate Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. City of Port Townsend v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.