Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1942No. 33,156Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a conviction of having violated this ordinance of the city of Minneapolis:

“No person, as hereinafter defined, shall sell, exchange, barter, dispose of or keep for sale any intoxicating liquor, as hereinafter defined, without first having obtained a license therefor as herein provided. * * * The terms ‘sale’ and ‘sell’ shall mean and include ,all barters and all manners or means of furnishing intoxicating liquor or liquors, including the selling, exchange, barter, disposition of or keeping for sale of such intoxicating liquor.”

The testimony abundantly sustains the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. State v. HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API