Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1942No. 33,156Published
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals from a conviction of having violated this ordinance of the city of Minneapolis:
“No person, as hereinafter defined, shall sell, exchange, barter, dispose of or keep for sale any intoxicating liquor, as hereinafter defined, without first having obtained a license therefor as herein provided. * * * The terms ‘sale’ and ‘sell’ shall mean and include ,all barters and all manners or means of furnishing intoxicating liquor or liquors, including the selling, exchange, barter, disposition of or keeping for sale of such intoxicating liquor.”
The testimony abundantly sustains the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walsh v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- State v. HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942