Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Lehner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 22, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a will contest. The plaintiffs sought to set aside the judgment of the Surrogate admitting the will to probate on the ground that the will was the product of undue influence upon the decedent. The trial court, however, uphéld the validity of the will. On appeal, the Appellate Division, with one judge dissenting, set aside the probate of the will holding that the trial court failed “to give effect to -the presumption of undue influence which was raised in the ffireumstanees of the case.”

We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division and reinstate the judgment of the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Blake's WillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. In Re RaynoldsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  3. Nixon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  4. Raynolds v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  5. In Re NixonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Garruto v. CanniciNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. In Re Estate of ChurikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Catelli v. VilloneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Haynes v. First Nat'l State Bk. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API