Legal Opinion

Defiore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 24, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00184Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION FRED P. DEFIORE, ) CASE NO. 1:18-cv-184 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) ) DEFENDANT. ) Before the Court is plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). (Doc. No. 24 [“Mot.”].) The Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) filed a response1 (Doc. No. 26 [“Resp.”]), and plaintiff filed a reply (Doc. No. 27 [“Reply”]). For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion is granted in part to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Culbertson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API