Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Cantrell

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 25, 1988No. 01-87-00453-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACK SMITH, Justice.

In a single point of error, Palmer appeals from an order granting Cantrell’s motion to dismiss on the basis of failure to comply with discovery requests. Although the order did not state that the action was being dismissed with prejudice, because the applicable statute of limitations on Palmer’s cause of action is expired, the dismissal without prejudice is tantamount to a dismissal with prejudice. See Kilgarlin, Sanctions for Discovery Abuse Under New Rule 215, 15 St. Mary’s L.J. 767, 801 (1983).

On February 17, 1987, Cantrell filed a motion to dismiss that asserted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. HollingsworthTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Drozd Corp. v. Capitol Glass & Mirror Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Notgrass v. Equilease Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zep Manufacturing Co. v. Anthony, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Mocega v. BRADFORD URQUHART, MD, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. Boateng v. Trailblazer Health Enterprises, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. United Business MacHine, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Media, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Seckers v. Ocean Chemicals, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API