Skipwith v. Young
Supreme Court of Virginia
THIS was an action of Tu-spaa:- on the < in behalf of Allen Young against June Skipwilh ior eonserpecllial injury to the health of the plahiitif’s family, and to hi- fafntí adjoining, occasioned by the erciuon oí <•: Mill and Dam hjv the defendant, on Cox’s Creek m th' County of Me-íklemhurg.
Read the full summary
THIS was an action of Tu-spaa:- on the < in behalf of Allen Young against June Skipwilh ior eonserpecllial injury to the health of the plahiitif’s family, and to hi- fafntí adjoining, occasioned by the erciuon oí <•: Mill and Dam hjv the defendant, on Cox’s Creek m th' County of Me-íklemhurg. The damages demanded • the tm-ation were tm.fiiij thousand dollars. >l j It plainly appeared: (Von. ids pleadings in he t-iause, that the right of the defendant to citv; the Mill was tjrliwjn in question. The Jury found a A >■"<:« 1 ,*.n favotu of she fía nt iff for one penny damages, besides k*>- tes…
1Opinion of the Court
December 2d, ISIli, the Judges .d(>lmjHB.heir opinions, seriatim.
Judge Coaeteb I'.- fovií qm s:iiií!*HÍ¡! .vises, and which alone has ,, ji< ib!- die, is whether the Court has ‘jurisdict &
It is an action on ease,, broi f.lii t.yjKie A ;>p--Il<-e against the Appellant, for n. nob.o,-m i>, iwetm# r- W-i* ÍX on her own land, whereby .s he tlle^e .. <h-' .• si ¡«>«n back
and overflows a p;;i of hi? ?,nP .-.Cjiii-ib.v;.. ijisu health of Ms family is injured.
There is a great vti-N-i of pleas, soiling on liu- right of the Appellant, by con- nr of lite Appt-lh e ami otherwise. to erect the Dam; to all…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Umbarger v. WattsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
- Rymer v. HawkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Greathouse v. SappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Miller v. Navigation Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Clark v. DowerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.