Legal Opinion
In Re Russell
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 9, 1988No. Civ. No. A4-88-150, A4-88-073, Bankruptcy No. 87-05818PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONMY, Chief Judge.
The Lomas & Nettleton Company, a Creditor of the above-named Debtors, appealed to the District Court, from an Order Confirming the Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan entered on March 17, 1988. The undisputed facts of this case are as follows. On April 1,1985, the Debtors executed a promissory note payable to the Lomas & Nettle-ton Company in the principal sum of Sixty Thousand Three Hundred Dollars, ($60,-300), with interest from that date at the rate of thirteen percent (13%), payable in monthly installments of $667.53 commencing on the 1st day of June, 1985, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jerry Maiatico and Matomic Operating Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- In Re HynsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- In Re CatlinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- In Re SimmonsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. Hart, Debtors. Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- In Re HarrisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Nobelman v. American Savings Bank (In Re Nobelman)District Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.