Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thuente v. Hart Motors

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1944No. 46413Published

1Dissent

Mantz, G. J.

(dissenting) — Being unable to agree with that part of the majority opinion holding that the lower court erred in sustaining a motion to direct a verdict in favor of defendants on Count I of the petition (being the negligence count), I therefore respectfully dissent to that portion of the opinion and concur in the other parts thereof.

I. Count I of the petition Avas based upon negligence; Count II, upon recklessness; both resulting in damages'claimed. The majority opinion holds that the lower court erred in submitting to the jury the claim based upon recklessness and also erred in…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Meyer v. HouckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Bever v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Watson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Wine v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API