Legal Opinion
GOLSHAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1981No. ID 2875PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #2875 MATTER OF GOLSHAN In Deportation Proceedings A-17850804 Decided by Board July 28, 1981 (1) Since section 9.95.240 of the Revised Code of Washington Annotated is a general expungemerst statute, a state court's order pursuant to that statute dismissing criminal charges after successful completion of probation does not eliminate a narcotics conviction for purposes of deportation. (2) Although the respondent's narcotics conviction renders him deportable notwithstanding its expungersent, the respondent is eligible for relief under section 212(c) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1162(c),…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Melesio Manuel Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- A-FBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959
- WERKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
- Santos Gonzalez De Lara v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Maximilliano De La Cruz-Martinez, Also Known as Max Cruz, Max De La Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- OZKOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Roberta Charmaine Garberding v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- MANRIQUEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1995
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.