Legal Opinion

McMurtry v. Keifner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1893No. 4910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was an action brought by the appellant for the partition of real estate. Plaintiff, in his petition filed in the district court, alleges that he is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the lands in dispute, and that the defendant William Keifner is the owner of the other undivided one-half interest thereof; that the defendant J. R. Richards, as trustee for the defendant State Loan & Trust ‘Company, has á mortgage heretofore executed by the defendant Keifner upon his interest in the premises, to secure the payment of $800, due July 1, 1893.

The defendant Keifner alone answered:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yahoola River & Cane Creek Hydraulic Hose Mining Co. v. IrbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  2. Costello v. BurkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. Potter v. WashburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
  4. Hardenburgh v. . LakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Seymour v. RickettsNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. DingwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hannah v. ChaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Baskins v. KrepcikNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API