Legal Opinion

Urgo v. Jamaica Savings Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 18, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment affirmed without costs.

Plaintiff brought this small claims action to recover $466, which she claimed she lost as a result of the defendant’s *984negligence. It was plaintiffs contention that the money was removed from her handbag while she was in defendant’s bank. The court dismissed the action and plaintiff has appealed, claiming that the actions of the court deprived her of substantial justice, that the bank was negligent and that the negligence was the proximate cause of her loss.

Contrary to plaintiffs contention, a review of the record discloses that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newsome v. PotterAlbany City Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. CorrellBinghamton City Court · 1993
  2. Cohen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API