Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentMiller, Presiding Judge
I concur in a result which would eliminate almost half of the amortized costs of Bailly N-1 but respectfully dissent in all other respects. In other words, I would find the Bailly N-1 project a proper statutorily authorized service expense for approximately $105-108 million of the total $190 million authorized by the commission. However, I would remand for further consideration of a portion-engineering costs-of the statutorily authorized amount by the Commission.
The majority opinion reflects two basic flaws that could and will turn the laws regulating public utilities in Indiana topsy-turvy.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Porter County Chapter of Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. Baker. Public Utilities Commission of District of Columbia v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.