Legal Opinion

Hale v. Riverboat Casino, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1984No. 14481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. Appellant, James R. Hale (Hale), brought suit to recover damages caused by respondent Riverboat Casino, Inc. (Riverboat). The jury favored him with its verdict following a four-day trial. Riverboat moved for a new trial, alleging juror misconduct and excessive punitive damages. The district court initially ordered a new trial unless Hale accepted a reduction in the amount of damages. Before Hale could accept the remittitur, the district court suci sponte ordered an unconditional new trial.

Hale appeals this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bull v. McCuskeyNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Randono v. TurkNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Barker v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McNair v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. BeckwithNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ace Truck & Equipment Rentals, Inc. v. KahnNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Phillips v. LynchNevada Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API