Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Motor Haulage Co. & International Brotherhood of Teamsters

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion to confirm award denied.

With respect to the contention of the respondent that the collective bargaining agreement expired on August 31, 1946, and that the arbitrator was without power to act thereafter, I am of opinion that this point is untenable. It appears that prior to that time, to wit, on or about May 31, 1946, petitioner made claim to the arbitrator for damages due to the work stoppage. The fact that the arbitrator did not proceed to act thereon until November, 1946, did not prevent him from proceeding to consider the claim. By the mentioned letter arbitration proceeding was set…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flannery v. . SahagianNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Russell & Sons v. Stampers & Gold Leaf Local Union No.22New York Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Lane & Leather Workers' Union of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. Sociedad Mario Mercado e HijosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  3. Labor Relations Board v. Sociedad Mario Mercado e HijosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API