Legal Opinion
Best v. Hinds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2014PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*677The Family Court properly determined that the father has the ability to pay child support in the sum of $738 per month (see Family Ct Act § 413). “A Support Magistrate is afforded considerable discretion in determining whether to impute income to a parent” (Matter of Julianska v Majewski, 78 AD3d 1182, 1183 [2010]), and we accord deference to a support magistrate’s credibility determinations (see Matter of Feng Lucy Luo v Yang, 89 AD3d 946, 947 [2011]; Matter of Tsarova v Tsarov, 59 AD3d 632, 633 [2009]). Here, the Support Magistrate’s findings regarding the father’s income, which were based…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feng Lucy Luo v. YangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Julianska v. MajewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Stone v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Svitlana Volodymyrivna Tsarova v. Mikhailo Viktorovych TsarovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kennedy v. VentimigliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Goehringer v. Vozza-NicolosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Stevenson v. BlancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re Latisha T'Keyah J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Latisha T'Keyah J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Rodgers-Feimster v. FeimsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019