Beam v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Ina Bea m, ) No. CV-21-08149-PCT-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian ) 12 Relocation, ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendant. ) 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff Ina Beam’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary 16 Judgment (Doc. 13) and Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation’s 17 (“Defendant”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17). Both Motions have been 18 fully briefed. (Docs. 13, 17, 21 & 23). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion will be 19 granted,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Henry GALLANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Betty L. Varney v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.