Legal Opinion

Beam v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 29, 2022No. 3:21-cv-08149Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Ina Bea m, ) No. CV-21-08149-PCT-SPL ) 9 ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian ) 12 Relocation, ) 13 ) ) 14 Defendant. ) 15 Before the Court are Plaintiff Ina Beam’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary 16 Judgment (Doc. 13) and Defendant Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation’s 17 (“Defendant”) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17). Both Motions have been 18 fully briefed. (Docs. 13, 17, 21 & 23). For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion will be 19 granted,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Henry GALLANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Betty L. Varney v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API