Legal Opinion
Wilemon v. Brown
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 29, 1943No. Civ. 884PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs seek to restrain the enforcement of an- order wherein they are “suspended, restrained and enjoined from selling, transferring or dealing in gasoline for a period of two weeks, * * They claim they do a large volume of business as retailers of automobile necessities, buying their product from refiners and selling at retail to consumers who drive into their stations.
That on May 1, 1943, they were served with an order charging them with having violated certain provisions of Ration Order 5 C issued by the Administrator of the O. P. A. That there were four…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Kessler v. StreckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Premier-Pabst Sales Co. v. GrosscupSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. WilemonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Perkins v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
- Jacobson v. BowlesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1944
- La Porte v. BitkerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
- Carroll v. FinchDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.