Borden v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWhitaker, Judge
I agree that under all the circumstances this plaintiff was not guilty of-negligence and, therefore, that the amount he claims should not have been deducted from his pay; but I do not agree that he has no right of action to recover it.
The majority recognize that he should have a right of action,1 but they feel compelled to hold that he has not by the decision of the Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. v. Johnson, 316 U.S. 481, 62 S.Ct. 1168, 86 L.Ed. 1611, and by previous decisions of our own court and of other courts. I do not feel so compelled.
This man sues on a contract he had with the Army…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. EliasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Gratiot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Kyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911