Legal Opinion

Henri Petetin, Inc. v. Baudean, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1931No. 13941Published

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Plaintiff, Henri Petetin, Inc., sought to have the court issue an injunction to restrain the defendant, Baudean, Inc., from listing in the telephone directory its former name, Pe-tetin-Baudean, Inc., and also to restrain the Southern Bell Telephone Company from carrying the alleged improper listing.

The telephone company, in its return to the rule nisi, averred that it had no interest in the controversy, and submitted the matter to the court. The defendant, Baudean, Inc., filed an exception of no right or cause of action, and also a return to the rule nisi, which was then tried on affidavits…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Slater v. . SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Borden Ice Cream Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  5. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone & Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API