Sires v. Clark
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Grundy Circuit Court. — Eon. George IF. Wanamaker, Judge. (1) Knotvledge of Sires precludes recovery in this cause. Overton v. Meggs, 105 S. W. 208; BroAvn v. BaldAvin, 121 Mo. 115. (2) Sires is not entitled to appropriate the defendant’s property by reason of his exercise of his OAvn rights.
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
This action avus begun and prosecuted to recover the Aralue of certain improvements made on certain lands in Grundy county, being eight-tenths of a forty-acre tract. The judgment in the trial court Avas for the plaintiff for |500, and the defendants prosecute this appeal. The case is a simple one involving questions Avhich have been frequently determined by the Supreme and appellate courts of the State, but *538it has been so filled in with extraneous and unnecessary matter that it has been somewhat difficult to select out of the mass the points pertaining to the case.
Plaintiff was the occupant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stump v. HornbackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Gallenkamp v. WestmeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Clark v. SiresSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Stump v. HornbeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rains v. MoulderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Hartog v. SieglerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Snadon v. GayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Buschmeyer v. EikermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Calloway Bank v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.