Albert Lorenz v. Charles W. Finkl

The majority opinion, with all due ■respect, though full of the sound and fury •of many statutes and rules, overlooks three significant factors.

A

Preliminarily, this is not a case in "which an applicant is being held to strict compliance with the Rules of Practice of the United States Patent Office in the interest of preserving sound procedural requirements.

This is a case in which an applicant, "who has proceeded entirely to the satisfaction of the Patent Office,1 and has become involved in an interference due to procedures initiated by the Patent Office, is losing an award of priority to…