Legal Opinion

McLean v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice YanYalkenbuegh

In October, 1884, McLean and Pearson were indicted for larceny in stealing one cow of the value of twenty-five dollars. They were tried in March, 1886, and the jury found them guilty, and the value of the property ten dollars.

They moved in arrest of judgment, “because the verdict of the jury finds the value of the heifer stolen * * ten dollars which makes the taking petit larceny and cognizable by a Justice’s Court, and that this court has no juris*282diction to punish.” The court overruled the motion and sentenced the defendants to pay a fine of fifty dollars each, and the costs. Prom this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . ReavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Ex parte DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. MalloySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  4. People v. HollandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carbajal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. Pope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Sellers v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  5. State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API