Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Blue Bird Body Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 16, 1993No. A92A2377PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff James P. Murphy appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Blue Bird Body Company (“Blue Bird”).
Blue Bird entered into a contract with defendant Applied Coating Technologies, Inc. (“ACT”) whereby ACT agreed to install a paint finishing system at Blue Bird’s LaFayette Plant (R. 631-36). One of the components of the system installed by ACT was a suction fan. After the system became operational, employees of Blue Bird noticed the fan was noisy and contacted the president of ACT, defendant Michael Jenkins, to request that he repair the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amear v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Dupree v. Keller Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Viau v. Fred Dean, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- United States v. AretzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Moss v. Central of Georgia RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Western Industries, Inc. v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Feggans v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Webb v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Hansen v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.