Legal Opinion

Rauch v. Tax Review Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1998No. 1127 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

John Rauch (Rauch) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that affirmed the decision of the Philadelphia Tax Review Board (Board) that held that payments for covenants not to compete are subject to the Philadelphia Net Profits Tax (NPT). We affirm.

Rauch withdrew from an architectural firm and received payments for his interest in the corporation, his interest in a partnership that held real property and his agreement not to compete as an architect for a stated period of time. Rauch challenged the decision by the Philadelphia Department…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. James A. Patterson and Dorothy A. Patterson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. BEALS'ESTATE v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Schaefer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  4. Cox v. HelveringDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1934
  5. Quaid v. Philadelphia Tax Review BoardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re QuinnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API