Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. St. Laurent

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1963No. 42692PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKyle, J.

This case is before us on appeal by Peerless Insurance Company, defendant in the court below, from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Harrison County, affirming a judgment of the county court rendered in favor of Simon St. Laurent, plaintiff, in the sum of $1,770 for loss of an insured automobile and its equipment covered by a family combination automobile policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant and alleged to have been stolen during the policy period.

The case was tried before the county judge on an agreed statement of facts, as follows:

*136It was stipulated and agreed by and between the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Maryland Cas. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Griggs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Ledvinka v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  4. National Fire Insurance v. SlaydenMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. SteeleMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co. v. PrinceMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Morris v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API