Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Leverett v. Leverett

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 22, 2013No. 2111042Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge

I agree that the trial court’s judgment is due to be reversed; however, my reasoning for reversing is different from that of the main opinion.

“Under the provisions of Rule 54(c) of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure it is the duty of the court to grant relief to which a party is entitled irrespective of the request for relief contained in the pleadings. Penney v. Carden, [356 So.2d 1188 (Ala.1978) ]. See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice § 54.62 (1976). However, Rule 54(c) does not sanction the granting of relief not requested in the pleadings where it appears that a party’s failure to ask for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sylvan Beach, Inc. v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Carden v. PenneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Penney v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. United States v. Paul D. Hardy and Irma Alice HardyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API